|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 8 2009, 12:53 AM EDT |
|
edit |
390 words added
5 words deleted
|
Change:
First, in contrast to the tightly constrained audio-articulatory modality of spoken language systems, which are articulated using the vocal tract, gesture systems involve the visual-gestural
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 8315)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Aug 10 2009, 9:54 PM EDT |
added 7.1 Unified Standard for SL annotation |
edit |
348 words added
206 words deleted
|
Change:
sign languages, as identified in this workshop group and codified within the desiderata for qualities of annotation standards in general. First, however, some prior discussion concerning the manual-visualdissemination modality.of Demonstratetools toand standards among the the communities of practice (sign language linguists) is necessary. For
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 4965)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Aug 4 2009, 1:05 AM EDT |
|
edit |
30 words added
|
Change:
Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech), pp. 1367-1370, Aalborg, September 2001. Lausberg, Hedda, and Han Sloetjes (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES–ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, 41 (3), 841-849.McKelvie, David, Amy Isard, Andreas Mengel, Morten
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 4819)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Aug 4 2009, 1:03 AM EDT |
|
edit |
59 words added
|
Change:
Neidle, Carol, Stan Sclaroff, and Vassilis Athitsos (2001). SignStream: A tool for linguistic and computer vision research on visual-gestural language data. Behavior Research Methods, 33, 311-320.Quek, Francis, Dan McNeill, Robert Bryll, and Mary Harper (2002) Gesture Spatialization in Natural Discourse Segmentation. Proceedings of the Seventh
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 4790)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Aug 4 2009, 12:43 AM EDT |
|
edit |
18 words added
8 words deleted
|
Change:
Analysis of Signal and Sense for more?]multi-modal human discourse 6.6. Other resourcesThe EMU Speech Database System (see Cassidy and Harrington, 2001): sourceforge pageISO TC37 SC4 - Language Resource Management : HomepageISO Data Category Registry for linguistic concepts GOLD (General Ontology for Linguistic Description)various (lineages
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 4729)
View all updates.
|
|
Agenda for Working Sessions -- Group I
|
Jul 19 2009, 5:29 PM EDT |
|
edit |
3 words added
|
Change:
codifyreorganize so that example standards and description of comes before the listagree on set of "needed standards" to describe in the last sectionparcel out the work of finishing the "white paper" version until 11:30, when we should stop to ...put together Final report Notes from WS4
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 533)
View all updates.
|
|
Notes Working Session 4 (WG4)
|
Jul 19 2009, 5:26 PM EDT |
|
edit |
371 words added
|
Change:
• MB: lessons and conventions to be taken from CHAT: allows segmenting words and terms, and identifying participant. It’s not all of CHAT that we want to cite as a standard, but the elements of CHAT that allow for conventions of annotation (e.g. turns) • gesture and sign •
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 363)
View all updates.
|
|
Notes Working Session 4 (WG4)
|
Jul 19 2009, 5:26 PM EDT |
|
create |
No content added or deleted. |
Change:
Created by Jul 19 2009, 5:26 PM EDT for: no reason given
View all updates.
|
|
Notes Working Session 3 (WS3)
|
Jul 19 2009, 5:22 PM EDT |
|
create |
No content added or deleted. |
Change:
Created by Jul 19 2009, 5:22 PM EDT for: no reason given
View all updates.
|
|
Agenda for Working Sessions -- Group I
|
Jul 19 2009, 12:18 PM EDT |
|
edit |
1 word added
5 words deleted
|
Change:
Link in Sarah's notesNotes from WS3 hereInterim Report 2 -- Sunday morning PUT REPORT HEREWorking Session 4 -- Sunday afternoonSee if anything needs to be added or changed in response to reactions to interim report 2, etc.Continue working on subsections until
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 467)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Jul 19 2009, 3:32 AM EDT |
|
edit |
50 words added
5 words deleted
|
Change:
of standardized sign language annotation are not to replace the primary data but to provide unified means for collaboration across the various linguistic domains using a shared platform of convention.Discuss the pros of this in examples: overlap of lx levels of analysis, ease of access to data, Examine
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 2929)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Jul 19 2009, 3:24 AM EDT |
|
edit |
59 words added
23 words deleted
|
Change:
in the introductory paragraph, annotation provides the conventionalized representation to compliment the data for exampleanalysis fromand currentpresentation literatureof onall domains in sign lexemes,languages.A classifiers,standard non-manualwhich superarticulationsExamine by typological contrast for variation and overlap across various sign languagesDisseminate the
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 2884)
View all updates.
|
|
Notes from WS3
|
Jul 19 2009, 3:12 AM EDT |
|
edit |
2 words added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
Tools,Tools, on 20090718 at 15:46, by MB) • Tools for making tools for checking well-formedness of annotations • SR: libraries, toolkits • con: requires software engineering knowledge • pro: non-standalone, provides anyone to roll your own • e.g. NLTK toolkit • Automation tools • RW:
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1393)
View all updates.
|
|
Notes from WS3
|
Jul 19 2009, 3:08 AM EDT |
|
edit |
3 words added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
“...“... What is annotation?In defining annotation, it is important to distinguish two conceptions of what annotation is. 1. Transcription: annotation constitutes (more or less) primary data for an analysis -- e.g. when
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1393)
View all updates.
|
|
Notes from WS3
|
Jul 19 2009, 2:57 AM EDT |
|
edit |
6 words added
9 words deleted
|
Change:
Working Session III• MB: recap from WS2 • Linked in interim report 1 • Edited main page: decisions about relevance and organization • Distribution of tasks • SR: interim report 2 (stop by 5:15 to discuss) • SC: take notes WS3 • Decided to have
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1393)
View all updates.
|
|
Notes from WS3
|
Jul 18 2009, 8:26 PM EDT |
|
edit |
1456 words added
|
Change:
• MB: On the one hand, annotation is transcription just as the data is (#1 above). On the other hand, we need to make the distinction that annotation is not equal to a writing system such as something developed thousands of years ago. (#2)• Why (#2) is necessary:•
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1390)
View all updates.
|
|
Notes from WS3
|
Jul 18 2009, 8:20 PM EDT |
|
create |
No content added or deleted. |
Change:
Created by Jul 18 2009, 8:20 PM EDT for: no reason given
View all updates.
|
|
Agenda for Working Sessions -- Group I
|
Jul 18 2009, 2:17 PM EDT |
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
Sarah?'sSarah's notes from WS3 hereInterim Report 2 -- Sunday morning PUT REPORT HEREWorking Session 4 -- Sunday afternoonSee if anything needs to be added or changed in response to reactions to interim report 2, etc.Continue working on subsections until 11:00,
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 462)
View all updates.
|
|
Agenda for Working Sessions -- Group I
|
Jul 18 2009, 2:17 PM EDT |
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
WHOSE?'sSarah?'s notes from WS3 hereInterim Report 2 -- Sunday morning PUT REPORT HEREWorking Session 4 -- Sunday afternoonSee if anything needs to be added or changed in response to reactions to interim report 2, etc.Continue working on subsections until 11:00,
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 462)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Jul 15 2009, 1:42 AM EDT |
|
edit |
183 words added
2 words deleted
|
Change:
If we are to educate others about the nature of sign languages as fully fledged languages, we should be responsible for providing a platform of
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1163)
View all updates.
|