|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 11 2009, 1:26 PM EDT |
|
edit |
5 words added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
of obscuring "sub-phonemic" variability is confoundedcompounded in most large-scale cross-sectional norming studies, in which fairly "broad" transcription is used in on-the-fly observations without a permanent audio recording,
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10696)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 11 2009, 1:25 PM EDT |
|
edit |
1 word added
|
Change:
of children. Edwards and Beckman (2008) suggest that even in cross-sectional studies where "narrow" transcription of recordings is done, transcription should be supplemented by experiments eliciting
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10691)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 11 2009, 1:24 PM EDT |
|
edit |
6 words added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
observations without a permanent audio recording, in order to be able to collect data from a large number children. Edwards and Beckman (2008) suggest that even in cross-sectional
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10690)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 11 2009, 1:03 PM EDT |
|
edit |
2 words added
|
Change:
(potentially continuous) perceptual responses from phonetically untrained native speaker/listeners. All of these researchers remind us that tokenization and paradigmatic differentiation at the level of vowels and
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10685)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 11 2009, 1:02 PM EDT |
|
edit |
7 words added
3 words deleted
|
Change:
category (or to an "expert" tie-breaker category when consensus is impossible.impossible). Pye, Wilcox, and Siren (1988) suggest that this practice hides the true nature of the difficulty, since points of
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10683)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 11 2009, 1:00 PM EDT |
|
edit |
134 words added
31 words deleted
|
Change:
Hewlett and Waters (2004) make a similar point, suggesting that the problem is confounded in most large-scale cross-sectional norming studies, in which fairly "broad" transcription is used in on-the-fly transcription, in order to be able to collect data from a large number children. Edwards and Beckman (2008) suggest that even
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10679)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 11 2009, 12:35 PM EDT |
|
edit |
680 words added
636 words deleted
|
Change:
Despite its success, the Penn Treebank has its weaknesses. One of these is the absence of a standard toolkit or user application for its viewing
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10566)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 10 2009, 2:31 PM EDT |
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
PhoneticsPhonetic Association. For example, Henry Sweet's A handbook of phonetics, published in 1877, includes vowel and consonant tables that are organized in terms of the same dimensions of analysis
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10478)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 10 2009, 2:27 PM EDT |
|
edit |
2 words added
2 words deleted
|
Change:
althoughwhile the target users are close-grained a close-grained community, widespread standard for sign language transcription and annotation is lacking. 4.4.1. What sign language annotation is, and what it is notWe begin by clarifying the purpose of a unified standard
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10478)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 10 2009, 10:28 AM EDT |
|
edit |
12 words added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
nodes within an annotation stream that has a reasonably fine-grained tokenization?UseabilityIs there good (accessible and extensible) documentation? Is there a suitably diverse and continuous community for teaching (and testing the ability of) new annotators / users?Are there good tools for annotating
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10478)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 10 2009, 10:24 AM EDT |
|
edit |
20 words added
20 words deleted
|
Change:
and on identification of broad morphosyntactic classes of phenomenaelements that are closecloser to the bottom of the prosodicconstituent hierarchy, where the psychophysics of the vocal-auditory channel interact with more general cognitive considerations of attention and memory to promote somea universal"temporal" tendenciesor insequential how
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10466)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 10 2009, 10:08 AM EDT |
|
edit |
15 words added
13 words deleted
|
Change:
conventionalized practices among a growing community. The ideal situation (projected solution) is one where sign language linguists, whether collaborating in an international workshop setting or via remote communications,
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10466)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 9 2009, 12:53 PM EDT |
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
1984,1877, includes vowel and consonant tables that are organized in terms of the same dimensions of analysis as the modern IPA chart -- i.e., openness,
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10464)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 9 2009, 8:16 AM EDT |
|
edit |
3 words added
1 word deleted
|
Change:
complimentcomplement the primary data record as a way of tagging and searching the data. And the goals of a unified sign language annotation standard are to provide a shared platform of convention for collaborating across the various linguistic domains. 4.4.2. What a unified standard providesFor all
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10464)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 9 2009, 8:14 AM EDT |
|
edit |
13 words added
7 words deleted
|
Change:
illustrated in the figures and examples in Section 1.The Language Archiving Techonology tool, ELAN, is a professional tool for the complex annotation of video and audio sources. "Tiers" are implemented for
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10462)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 9 2009, 8:04 AM EDT |
|
edit |
125 words added
10 words deleted
|
Change:
section we described how phonological and phonetic annotation is easier for broad class distinctions at the leaf nodes of the prosodic hierarchy, where tokenization is
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10456)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 9 2009, 7:24 AM EDT |
|
edit |
1 word added
|
Change:
comparably compelling natural basis for tokenization of melodic events, spoken languages are much more diverse in the ways in which utterances are structured above the leaf
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10338)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 9 2009, 7:23 AM EDT |
|
edit |
3 words added
|
Change:
and paradigmatic differentiation at the level of vowels and consonants is a product of the interaction of the natural constraints from the aerodynamics with the exigencies of
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10337)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 9 2009, 7:22 AM EDT |
|
edit |
3 words added
|
Change:
(paradigmatic and syntagmatic) phonological structures that may not be in place until the child is much older. See the discussion of this point in Pye, Wilcox, and
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10334)
View all updates.
|
|
Group 1: Annotation Standards
|
Sep 9 2009, 7:21 AM EDT |
|
edit |
6 words added
|
Change:
and "suprasegmental" parsing differences into a phonemic segmental model. Alphabetic annotation of pre-school children's speech poses special challenges, then, because it assumes phonological structures that may not be in place
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 10331)
View all updates.
|