|
Aug 31 2009, 2:23 PM EDT
|
alexispalmer
|
|
move |
No content added or deleted. |
|
Change: Moved by Aug 31 2009, 2:23 PM EDT
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 2:17 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 1002)
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 2:13 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
14 words added
5 words deleted
|
|
Change: in ISO standards developmentRead up on the ISO standards development process (such as http://www.iso.org/iso/my_iso_job.pdf) and other docs on the ISO website (such as http://www.iso.org/iso/joining_in_2007.pdf and http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development.htm )Contact the Convener of the Working Group (WG) you are interested
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1002)
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 2:03 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
15 words added
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: observer (or, as a member, see above). Contact Deborah Anderson, UC Berkeley representative to the Unicode Consortium, for further information (dwanders at berkeley dot edu [with no spaces]).Submit feedback on the Unicode Standard, its other specifications, or any aspect of the Unicode website via the Unicode website form.
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 993)
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 1:54 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
6 words added
3 words deleted
|
|
Change: specifications, or the Unicode website via the Unicode website. References: ISO Technical committees (TC) / Subcommittees (SC) / Joint Technical Committees (JTC) of Interest to LinguistsTC 37/SC 4 - Language resource management (work on feature structures, morpho-syntactic
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 984)
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 1:50 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
46 words added
14 words deleted
|
|
Change: Contact Deborah Anderson, UC Berkeley representative to the Unicode Consortium, for further information (dwanders at berkeley dot edu [with no spaces]).Submit feedback on the Unicode Standard or its other specifications via the Unicode website.website. References: ISO Technical committees (TC) /
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 981)
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 1:22 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
268 words added
|
|
Change: The UTC discussions can be quite technical in nature, as UTC members - drawn largely from the computer industry - need to be sure that
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 955)
|
|
Aug 29 2009, 12:18 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
13 words added
9 words deleted
|
|
Change: linguists get GetInvolved Inin ISO Standardsstandards Development?development?The International Organization for Standardization (http://www.iso.org) is a very large organization with standards covering everything from screw thread specifications to language tags. Because standards development is “based on voluntary involvement
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 686)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 7:50 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
5 words added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: in Cyberling 2009 (e.g., MAF, ISO 639 [language tags], and ISOcat [ISO 12620]). But this raises the more general question: how can linguists participate in ISO standards development and why is it important they do?What is ISO and Why Should Linguists Get In ISO Standards Development?The
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 683)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 7:07 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
4 words added
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: longevity for such a standard.longevity. The ISO Process The process of developing and approving a standard can be quite lengthy, lasting several years. Hence participation requires time, commitment, and dedication from those who wish to participate. Meetings can be held in different locations
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 679)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 7:03 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
2 words added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: [ISO 12620]). But this raises the more general question: how can linguists participate in ISO standards development and why is it important they do?What is ISO and Why Should Linguists Get In ISO Standards Development?The International Organization for Standardization (http://www.iso.org) is a very
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 681)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 7:01 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
4 words added
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: LAF, GrAF, MAF, SynAF,ISO SemAF-TIME,639 LMF[language tags], and ISOcat). But this raises the more general question: how can linguists participate in ISO standards development and why is it important they do?What is ISO and Why Should Linguists Get In ISO Standards Development?The
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 679)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 6:50 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
5 words added
10 words deleted
|
|
Change: standards' acronymsstandards have been mentioned (e.g., LAF,LAF, GrAF,GrAF, MAF, SynAF, SemAF-TIME,SemAF-TIME, LMF and ISOcat). But this raises the more general question: how can linguists participate in ISO standards development and why is it important they do?What is
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 681)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 6:43 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
87 words added
55 words deleted
|
|
Change: they can act as intermediaries to encourage such user community participation. For groups who have been developing their own set of standards independent of ISO, funneling theirsuch work into an ISO standard will help guarantee long-term stability and longevity for such a standard. The ISO Process The
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 683)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 5:59 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
633 words added
|
|
Change: Because standards development is “based on voluntary involvement of all interests in the market place,” it is very important for linguists to participate in the
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 653)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 4:13 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
move |
No content added or deleted. |
|
Change: Moved by DeborahAnderson Aug 28 2009, 4:13 PM EDT
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 3:47 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
create |
No content added or deleted. |
|
Change: Created by DeborahAnderson Aug 28 2009, 3:47 PM EDT for: no reason given
|