Group 6: Funding ModelsThis is a featured page

By funding models, we mean ways of securing funding to build and maintain the various pieces of the linguistic cyberinfrastructure: standards, corpora, archives, tools. This includes the tools that linguists use to access the data, and also the tools that make it possible (or even easy) for ordinary linguists to produce and publish standards-compatible data.

The Funding Models group will consider how to fund the creation and maintenance of this ongoing cyberinfrastructure for linguistic data. Most pieces of this cyberinfrastructure are created as part of larger projects or as spin-off from other activities; and often, a particular corpus or tool will have different funding models for creation, maintenance/evolution, and distribution.

[Some preliminary thoughts by group co-chair Mark Liberman are here.]

[The outline of our preliminary report on Sunday morning is here.]

We note that there is a prior question: how to organize the process. In particular, the balance between central planning and bottom-up initiative is an issue to think about.



Other resource pages: Linguist List Software Page, Natural Language Software Registry, SIL's Linguistics Computing Resources on the Internet, Open Translation Tools




MarkYLiberman
MarkYLiberman
Latest page update: made by MarkYLiberman , Jul 19 2009, 1:00 PM EDT (about this update About This Update MarkYLiberman Edited by MarkYLiberman

286 words deleted

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
DeborahAnderson Another funding source: UNESCO 0 Aug 31 2009, 5:02 PM EDT by DeborahAnderson
Thread started: Aug 31 2009, 5:02 PM EDT  Watch
I wanted to mention that another potential source of funding is UNESCO. I have received some funding via Initiative B@bel, which seems to be part of "Multilingualism in Cyberspace" program in UNESCO. I have found those involved at Initiative B@bel to be very dedicated, though UNESCO does seem to be a bit slow in processing paperwork (but no more so than the large US-based agencies).
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
haspelmath DoD and DARPA funding 0 Jul 21 2009, 12:56 AM EDT by haspelmath
Thread started: Jul 21 2009, 12:56 AM EDT  Watch
The outline of the preliminary report mentions "DARPA" and "DoD" as possible funding sources. Since the U.S. Department of "Defense" has been responsible for some of the world's worst criminal violence over the last decade, I consider it morally unacceptable to collaborate with it, and I think scientists should dissociate themselves from this organization. In fact, the recommendation is in direct conflict with the recently published LSA Ethics Statement ("Linguists should do everything in their power to ensure that their research poses no threat to the well-
being of research participants." Selling research on languages -- Pashto was mentioned during the discussion on Sunday -- to the DoD may pose a direct threat to the speech community.).

Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
EmilyMBender Cross-group discussion 0 Jul 16 2009, 6:43 PM EDT by EmilyMBender
Thread started: Jul 16 2009, 6:43 PM EDT  Watch
The question of organization of effort is also central to the concerns of WG7. I wanted to flag that interaction now so that we pay attention to it during the workshop this weekend.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
Showing 3 of 3 threads for this page
Adobe Portable Document Format HSD_DCL_nsf09019.pdf (Adobe Portable Document Format - 53k)
posted by MarkYLiberman   Jul 14 2009, 4:11 PM EDT
NSF: "New funds" available for activities in three areas that "differ in scope or scale from the traditional core of the programs"