Change: LinkeddataLinked Data (use of URIs and RDF)Cloud computing (infrastructure as service)Web Services Sources of inspiration (pieces of software)Pangaea (repository and citation, cf. OLAC)FreeBase (open, free community model, cf. GOLDComm)Nanohub (educational materials portal, cf. LinguistList)OpenWetWare (info and practices site, cf. glottopedia)ManyEyes (visualization   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 234)

Change: almost by definitiondata (but sensitive to access restrictions)easy to cite (DOIs, URIs)Collaborative/organizational structure collaborative modularity: tailoring data for a certain project is not the best model for collaborative data. Instead, keep the overall idea of data sharing in mind when projects are planned.TechnologyInternet   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 233)

Change: Should we use currently available tool and infrastructure, or build our own linguistics-specific CI?Is it possible/desirable to organize ourselves as a field (or part of a federation of fields) to achieve a kind of infrastructure we see in other fields?Synergy between theory and application:   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 131)

Change: well-designed virtual organization for promoting and sustaining the cyberinfrastructureKey questions:Is it possible/desirable to organize ourselves as a field (or part of a federation of fields) to achieve a kind of infrastructure we see in other fields?Synergy between theory and application: e.g.,   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 95)

Change: Is it possible/desirable to organize ourselves as a field (or part of a federation of fields) to achieve a kind of infrastructure we see in other fields?Synergy between theory and application: e.g., interaction among linguists as a field   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 55)