|
Jul 22 2009, 12:21 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: versioningversion control and remote collaboration)Goals of this case study:Demonstrate the use of versioning software in an online research collaboration area (ORCA) to register the changes made to spoken
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1512)
|
|
Jul 22 2009, 12:21 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
89 words added
3 images added
3 images deleted
|
|
Change: Figure 2a shows the SharePoint pulldown for a file called SR2CF2A_non-conversational. This is an orthographic transcription file that exists in several versions because it has
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1512)
|
|
Jul 21 2009, 9:01 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
29 words added
28 words deleted
|
|
Change: [under construction: limitations and advantages of using versioning for spoken software. ]4. Metadata• Akustyk software is used for associating project, speaker and token level metadata with events in the sound file.• A project handbook registers methodology and decisions made.The metadata associated with all recordings is here
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1421)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:42 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
14 words added
|
|
Change: or content of different versions. They want to know the version number. -researchers picking up the corpus to use for addressing new research questions are the group most likely to benefit from access to versions of the data (to know what version of the data they are working with, see
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1417)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:40 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
2 words added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: sample).sample). Versioning software:• Concurrent Versions System (CVS): An open-source revision control system (http://www.nongnu.org/cvs/)• Subversion: An open-source revision control system (http://subversion.tigris.org/)• Microsoft Sharepoint Server, 2007 (http://sharepoint.microsoft.com/Pages/Default.aspx)Benefits of utilizing version control software:-Very easy to use-Allows research team to avoid
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1403)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:38 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
64 words added
5 words deleted
|
|
Change: of the project includes: 1) the project website, 2) exemplifying soundfiles that may be played out or downloaded from maps on the project website, 3)
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1403)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:35 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
4 words added
5 words deleted
|
|
Change: Fig 3. Screenshot showing topic list from the general discussion site• [under construction: limitations and advantages of using versioning for spoken software. ]4. Metadata• Akustyk software is used for associating project, speaker and token level metadata with events in the sound file.• A project
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1344)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:34 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
2 words added
2 words deleted
|
|
Change: (Fig(Figs 2).2a,b). Fig 2a. version history pulldown from main document libraryFig 2b. Screenshot of version history comment page• Crucially, all prior versions are available to the user. This allows full control and comparison of different versions of the documents stored in the library without overwriting data.
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1343)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:33 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
13 words added
5 words deleted
|
|
Change: hybrid methodology, combining phonetic analysis with a standard multi-part variationist sociolinguistic interview schedule allowing collection of data in different spoken registers (unscripted conversation, one-on-one interview, reading passage, word lists, semantic differentials, syntactic diagnostic prompts). • While we cannot make all elicitation instruments available viain thethis wiki
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1342)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:30 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
97 words added
7 words deleted
|
|
Change: The project outcomes include: acoustic analysis of vowel speakers of speakers indigenous to the PNW (formant data, amplitude and duration measures), orthographic transcriptions of 200
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1333)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:23 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
23 words added
11 words deleted
|
|
Change: PACIFIC NORTHWEST 200 YEARS AFTER LEWIS AND CLARKNational Science Foundation Award: BCS-0643374(Alicia Beckford Wassink, Principle Investigator, University of Washington, Department of Linguistics)Software used: Microsoft Sharepoint Server 2007 (for versioning control and remote collaboration)Goals of this case study:Demonstrate the use of versioning
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1241)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:19 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
60 words added
15 words deleted
4 images added
|
|
Change: time, but other software (such as CSV, Subversion, etc) does not have this limitation.• The file is modified by the user.• At the end of a work session, the user uploads the modified version
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1228)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 3:55 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
77 words added
33 words deleted
|
|
Change: of the version softwareis). actualloyIf requiresa researcher has even a minimumsmall amountset of userbasic effortprinciples tofor judging what types of comments are meaningful, supplying version comments can require little user maintain.effort. In short, a little goes a long way.
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1183)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 3:47 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
43 words added
35 words deleted
|
|
Change: As an example of versioning, we can look at how a sociophonetic study uses versioning software in a collaborative research collaboration area (ORCA).Project description from the project homepage (http://www.artsci.washington.edu/nwenglish/index.asp):The Pacific Northwest English project investigates the features of English
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1139)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 3:02 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
7 words deleted
|
|
Change: [[insert screenshot: document library navigation bar]]• Version control requires (in this case, although other versioning software varies) that each user check out a soundfile or transcript from the document library. Only one user may check out a file at a time.• The file is modified by the user.
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1131)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 2:56 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
214 words added
|
|
Change: We want version control to be easy for the researcher, and useful. Once we begin to use a tool, there may be more information than
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1137)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 2:38 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 923)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 2:38 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
137 words added
|
|
Change: done on the same file by different users-Members of the working team located remotely may all access common elements in the same workspace when they *do* talk together (e.g. video or teleconferencing); and contribute without the risk of overwriting each other's work
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 923)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 2:27 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
2 words added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: clearinghouse,clearinghouse, Sociolinguistics Laboratory, University of Washington.• Field data are recorded in the field for a judgement sample and in the laboratory using telephony devices to acquire data for a complementary random sample.2. Storage• Original recordings (recorded at a 44.1kHz
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 781)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 2:20 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 781)
|