Change: By actively participating in ISO standardization, linguists will have a vested interest in using them and advocating their use amongst colleagues and students. Involvement by   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 968)

Change: priviledgeprivilege assignment, copyright and data ownershipLEGACY DATA providing within-subfield model for best practices data sharingADAPTIVE CODING ability to adjust data coding scheme as knowledge evolvesCONSISTENCY consistency and quality of data annotations** SUBFIELD-SPECIFIC USABILITY CONCERNS specialized standards, metadata sets, ontologies, etc.PUBLICATIONSTABLE ADDRESSING OF RESOURCES   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 843)

Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details. (Word count: 843)

Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details. (Word count: 812)

Change: The table below displays some of the key areas of concern for each of the four topics we take to fall within our domain of interest. STORAGERETRIEVALSEARCHACCESS/REUSEMETADATAMETADATAMETADATAMETADATADIGITIZATION of both primary data & metadataVERSIONING tracking major changes/decisions made and motivations for same   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 812)

Change: (*We call this a questionable division because the four are deeply interrelated.)Storage of digital dataRetrieval and discoverability of digital data (i.e. discoverability at the document or resource level)Search of digital data (i.e. discoverability at the within-document level)Access and reusability of digital dataan aside...standards   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 704)

Change: accomplishing some task (often related to analysis, description, or publication) in linguistics (e.g., the IPA system for phonetic transcription), not more general practicestranscription)Named (so practicioners may name standards to which their practices adhere in published work, for example) Official (new standards will explicitly   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 695)

Change: WG2: Big ideas -- not yet written upsimple but powerful toolsprivacy and ethics concerns must be considered How do we define 'other standards'?For the purposes of this workshop, we take our domain of interest to   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 674)

Change: concerns must be considered How do we define 'other standards'?For the purposes of this workshop, we take our domain of interest to be standards related to the sharing of language data within the linguistics community. The discussion is organized around a questionable* division of data sharing into four subtopics:   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 674)

Change: We weren’t certain that linguistics, as a field or academic culture, has a tradition of clearly differentiating standards from best practices. We do not have   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 1)