|
Aug 29 2009, 2:10 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
29 words added
9 words deleted
|
|
Change: (This page also includes a short section on how to participate in the development of the Unicode Standard.) By actively participating in ISO standardization, linguists will have a vested interest in using them and advocating theirthe use amongst colleaguesof andsuch students.standards. Involvement by
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 987)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 7:39 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
134 words added
11 words deleted
|
|
Change: By actively participating in ISO standardization, linguists will have a vested interest in using them and advocating their use amongst colleagues and students. Involvement by
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 968)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 4:21 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 843)
|
|
Aug 28 2009, 3:33 PM EDT
|
DeborahAnderson
|
|
edit |
5 words added
5 words deleted
|
|
Change: priviledgeprivilege assignment, copyright and data ownershipLEGACY DATA providing within-subfield model for best practices data sharingADAPTIVE CODING ability to adjust data coding scheme as knowledge evolvesCONSISTENCY consistency and quality of data annotations** SUBFIELD-SPECIFIC USABILITY CONCERNS specialized standards, metadata sets, ontologies, etc.PUBLICATIONSTABLE ADDRESSING OF RESOURCES
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 843)
|
|
Aug 15 2009, 12:05 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 843)
|
|
Aug 15 2009, 12:03 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 843)
|
|
Aug 14 2009, 2:21 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
31 words added
|
|
Change: Of course, a commitment to communication, collaboration, coordination, community building and open access to data are crucial for supporting the use of standards. Working Group 7 discussed this issue.Future work:WG2: Big ideas -- not yet written upsimple but powerful toolsprivacy and ethics concerns must be considered
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 843)
|
|
Aug 14 2009, 2:16 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
|
|
Change: There were only format changes (bold, italics, etc.) in this version. See this version for details.
(Word count: 812)
|
|
Aug 14 2009, 2:15 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
1 word added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: 45 explored ways that other disciplines are sharing data, so we may learn from these examples.Publication mechanisms for linguistic data collections are one possibility for encouraging adoption of standards. Receiving academic credit for publication of data would provide
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 812)
|
|
Aug 14 2009, 2:15 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
279 words added
178 words deleted
|
|
Change: The table below displays some of the key areas of concern for each of the four topics we take to fall within our domain of interest. STORAGERETRIEVALSEARCHACCESS/REUSEMETADATAMETADATAMETADATAMETADATADIGITIZATION of both primary data & metadataVERSIONING tracking major changes/decisions made and motivations for same
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 812)
|
|
Aug 14 2009, 2:02 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
12 words added
4 words deleted
|
|
Change: the IPA system for phonetic transcriptionHow do we define 'other standards'?For the purposes of this workshop, we take our domain of interest to be standards related to the sharing of language data within the linguistics community. The discussion is organized
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 710)
|
|
Aug 14 2009, 1:58 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
12 words added
12 words deleted
|
|
Change: (*We call this a questionable division because the four are deeply interrelated.)Storage of digital dataRetrieval and discoverability of digital data (i.e. discoverability at the document or resource level)Search of digital data (i.e. discoverability at the within-document level)Access and reusability of digital dataan aside...standards
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 704)
|
|
Jul 20 2009, 11:38 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
11 words added
2 words deleted
|
|
Change: topics we take to fall within our domain of interest. (*We call this a questionable division because the four are deeply interrelated.)STORAGERETRIEVALSEARCHACCESS/REUSEMETADATAMETADATAMETADATAMETADATADIGITIZATION of both primary data & metadataVERSIONING tracking major changes/decisions made and motivations for sameSOURCE MATERIALS linking
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 704)
|
|
Jul 20 2009, 11:37 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
28 words added
12 words deleted
|
|
Change: accomplishing some task (often related to analysis, description, or publication) in linguistics (e.g., the IPA system for phonetic transcription), not more general practicestranscription)Named (so practicioners may name standards to which their practices adhere in published work, for example) Official (new standards will explicitly
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 695)
|
|
Jul 20 2009, 11:30 AM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
6 words added
2 words deleted
|
|
Change: within the field that sets standards. Subfields are autonomous and vary to the extent that standards or best practices are discussed, named and adhered to. We nonetheless
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 678)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 4:57 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
19 words added
19 words deleted
|
|
Change: WG2: Big ideas -- not yet written upsimple but powerful toolsprivacy and ethics concerns must be considered How do we define 'other standards'?For the purposes of this workshop, we take our domain of interest to
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 674)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 3:11 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
5 words added
4 words deleted
|
|
Change: -- not yet written upsimple but powerful tools standards vs. best practicesprivacy and ethics concerns must be considered How do we define 'other standards'?For the purposes of this workshop, we take our domain of interest
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 674)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 2:54 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
4 words added
3 words deleted
|
|
Change: concerns must be considered How do we define 'other standards'?For the purposes of this workshop, we take our domain of interest to be standards related to the sharing of language data within the linguistics community. The discussion is organized around a questionable* division of data sharing into four subtopics:
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 674)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 1:55 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
662 words added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: We weren’t certain that linguistics, as a field or academic culture, has a tradition of clearly differentiating standards from best practices. We do not have
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 673)
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 1:51 PM EDT
|
|
|
edit |
1 word added
652 words deleted
|
|
Change: We weren’t certain that linguistics, as a field or academic culture, has a tradition of clearly differentiating standards from best practices. We do not have
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 1)
|